Comparison

Claude Max 5× vs Google AI Ultra $100 (Antigravity) for coding

At p50 peak, Claude Max 5× returns 0.60 building h/week per $/month (60 h/week for $100/mo) and Google AI Ultra $100 (Antigravity) returns 0.25 building h/week per $/month (25 h/week for $100/mo), so Claude Max 5× gives more building hours per dollar; Claude Max 5× runs a benchmark-measured model for building (55.0/100 quality), the other does not; Google AI Ultra $100 (Antigravity) hours are guessed — treat them as a guess.

Claude Max 5× vs Google AI Ultra $100 (Antigravity), side by side

Same catalog, same clock: p50 with p10–p90 intervals. Quality is each seat's coding-agent benchmark score with its agent and reasoning setting.

Claude Max 5×Google AI Ultra $100 (Antigravity)
Price$100/mo$100/mo
Building h/week p50 (p10–p90), peak60 (30–120)25 (10–50)
Building h/week p50 (p10–p90), off-peak——
Building h/week per $/mo at p50 peak0.600.25
Benchmark quality /100sFable 5.1 (max) (with fallback) · Claude Code · 62/100 planning · Sonnet 5.5 (high) · Claude Code · 55/100 building · Sonnet 5.5 (high) · Claude Code · 55/100 adminnot measured planning · not measured building · not measured admin
Sourcecommunityguessed
Terminal CLI agentYesYes
Clockno published off-peak discountlimits refresh every 5h, weekly cap; no off-peak rate