Comparison

Codex Pro 200 vs GLM Max for coding

At p50 peak, Codex Pro 200 returns 0.10 building h/week per $/month (20 h/week for $200/mo) and GLM Max returns 0.27 building h/week per $/month (45 h/week for $168/mo), so GLM Max gives more building hours per dollar; on building benchmark quality Codex Pro 200 runs GPT-6.1 Sol (high) · Codex · 60/100 and GLM Max runs GLM-5.3 · Opencode · 54/100; Codex Pro 200 hours are guessed — treat them as a guess.

Codex Pro 200 vs GLM Max, side by side

Same catalog, same clock: p50 with p10–p90 intervals. Quality is each seat's coding-agent benchmark score with its agent and reasoning setting.

Codex Pro 200GLM Max
Price$200/mo$168/mo
Building h/week p50 (p10–p90), peak20 (10–32)45 (24–90)
Building h/week p50 (p10–p90), off-peak—90 (48–180)
Building h/week per $/mo at p50 peak0.100.27
Benchmark quality /100sGPT-6.1 Sol (high) · Codex · 60/100 planning · GPT-6.1 Sol (high) · Codex · 60/100 building · GPT-6.1 Sol (high) · Codex · 60/100 adminGLM-5.3 · Opencode · 54/100 planning · GLM-5.3 · Opencode · 54/100 building · GLM-5.3 · Opencode · 54/100 admin
Sourceguessedofficial-clock + lived
Terminal CLI agentYesYes
Clockno published off-peak discountpeak Mon–Fri 07:00–11:00 London