Comparison

Codex Pro 200 vs Google AI Ultra $200 (Antigravity) for coding

At p50 peak, Codex Pro 200 returns 0.10 building h/week per $/month (20 h/week for $200/mo) and Google AI Ultra $200 (Antigravity) returns 0.23 building h/week per $/month (45 h/week for $200/mo), so Google AI Ultra $200 (Antigravity) gives more building hours per dollar; Codex Pro 200 runs a benchmark-measured model for building (60.0/100 quality), the other does not; Codex Pro 200 hours are guessed — treat them as a guess; Google AI Ultra $200 (Antigravity) hours are guessed — treat them as a guess.

Codex Pro 200 vs Google AI Ultra $200 (Antigravity), side by side

Same catalog, same clock: p50 with p10–p90 intervals. Quality is each seat's coding-agent benchmark score with its agent and reasoning setting.

Codex Pro 200Google AI Ultra $200 (Antigravity)
Price$200/mo$200/mo
Building h/week p50 (p10–p90), peak20 (10–32)45 (18–90)
Building h/week p50 (p10–p90), off-peak——
Building h/week per $/mo at p50 peak0.100.23
Benchmark quality /100sGPT-6.1 Sol (high) · Codex · 60/100 planning · GPT-6.1 Sol (high) · Codex · 60/100 building · GPT-6.1 Sol (high) · Codex · 60/100 adminnot measured planning · not measured building · not measured admin
Sourceguessedguessed
Terminal CLI agentYesYes
Clockno published off-peak discountlimits refresh every 5h, weekly cap; no off-peak rate