Comparison

Codex Pro 100 vs Google AI Ultra $100 (Antigravity) for coding

At p50 peak, Codex Pro 100 returns 0.16 building h/week per $/month (16 h/week for $100/mo) and Google AI Ultra $100 (Antigravity) returns 0.25 building h/week per $/month (25 h/week for $100/mo), so Google AI Ultra $100 (Antigravity) gives more building hours per dollar; Codex Pro 100 runs a benchmark-measured model for building (62.0/100 quality), the other does not; Codex Pro 100 hours are guessed — treat them as a guess; Google AI Ultra $100 (Antigravity) hours are guessed — treat them as a guess.

Codex Pro 100 vs Google AI Ultra $100 (Antigravity), side by side

Same catalog, same clock: p50 with p10–p90 intervals. Quality is each seat's coding-agent benchmark score with its agent and reasoning setting.

Codex Pro 100Google AI Ultra $100 (Antigravity)
Price$100/mo$100/mo
Building h/week p50 (p10–p90), peak16 (8–28)25 (10–50)
Building h/week p50 (p10–p90), off-peak——
Building h/week per $/mo at p50 peak0.160.25
Benchmark quality /100sGPT-6 Astra (max) · Codex · 62/100 planning · GPT-6 Astra (max) · Codex · 62/100 building · GPT-6 Astra (max) · Codex · 62/100 adminnot measured planning · not measured building · not measured admin
Sourceguessedguessed
Terminal CLI agentYesYes
Clockno published off-peak discountlimits refresh every 5h, weekly cap; no off-peak rate